In part one, we explored some ways in which machinery can influence its surroundings in an anti-gravity, post-conventional physics mode. We saw that it was complicated by additional backstories or the need for extremes of temperature or magnetic energy.
Now we turn to the human voice - does it play a role in altering the structure of matter? For this, we can consider the research of John Stuart Reid, who has for many years been working almost single handedly in the study of acoustic transformation of water. Reid discovered that sonic emissions from the human voice of spiritually oriented individuals perturb the surface of water in such a way that it creates a sevenfold structure on its surface – although he has observed this many times, he is unable to explain why or how.
Photographic evidence is presented in the conference lecture below, where he additionally shows that water appears to have "memory" of acoustic events. To confirm this, Reid exposed water to various frequencies and music, whose acoustic vibrations created symmetrical arrangements on the water surface in a container. After an interval of silence, he played the sounds again. The amount of time it took the water to recreate the surface pattern decreased with each successive play of the sounds, suggesting that some structural source in the water itself had remembered the sound.
Reid also found that cancer cells exposed to certain frequencies created non-symmetrical patterns
that are different from healthy ones:
Similarly, Masaru Emoto has also led research into the diverse patterns in which water organizes itself based on different musical works, as well as thoughts:
The same is true for the case when, under experimental conditions, certain positive or negative thoughts are directed at water - below are the patterns corresponding to each thought:
There is therefore reason to believe that water has some kind of consciousness, not of the human kind, but an awareness of and response to its environment.
The same holds true for plants, which have been shown in research conditions to "sleep" (stop moving) when exposed to anesthetics.
Far beyond this, plants have been shown to react immediately to human thoughts as evident in the revolutionary research of Cleve Backster, who, beginning in 1966, filmed several experiments aimed at measuring how human beings’ mental states and intentions affected a plant near them. In each experiment, a plant’s reaction to human beings is measured on an oscilloscope attached to one of its leaves.
In the first experiment, Backster wielded a large knife and brought a large head of lettuce. As Backster began to cut the lettuce in front of the plant, the oscilloscope began to register nervous, quick-moving, and irregular spikes:
To corroborate the persistence of the plant’s reaction, the question was expanded: would the plant remember someone who had done the same thing, out of a group of people?
A second experiment requires two plants – one with a sensor attached, and another without – as well as the participation of a group of human subjects. A small basket is passed around among them, so that they may select a folded “secret” note which provides instructions as to what they are supposed to do in front of the plant.
Based on their instructions, each of the subjects then appears, one by one, in front of the plant, and spend a few moment thinking the thoughts or performing the actions indicated in their instructions.
One of the subjects is given a particularly intense thought instruction:
to kill the plant without the attached sensor.
He then mangles the non-connected plant:
Now comes the memory test: each subject appears separately before the plant and thinks what their instructions directed them to think:
In every case - except one - the plant’s sensor show a flat, unresponsive line:
But at some point, the test subject who mangled the neighboring plant appears:
The plant becomes agitated:
The plant recognized the man who committed “plant murder.” Backster’s research cannot be explained away as a simple false positive; the experiment provides the same results after subsequent randomized trials. Here is the full video:
Discovery Science - Cleve Backster
Similarly, an experiment exposing two seeded plant pots to separate human voices showed a significant difference in the height of their plants later on. One pot was exposed to the I Have a Dream speech by Martin Luther King, Jr., while another was exposed to speeches by Adolf Hitler. A third pot, exposed to neither voice, was allowed to grow normally. After 15 days, the "Hitler plant" grew to 65 cm in height, compared with 85 cm in the "King plant" or 83 cm in the control group plant:
There is no question that, beyond our ability to explain all the physical processes involved, matter responds to vibrational stimuli, whether acoustic, magnetic, or psychic. Can humans act as such antennas for thought forms? An esoteric form of movement appears to show this transformational practice in action.
Thus the final examples of this come from the work of a mystic about whom I’ll have more to say in the future – G. I. Gurdjieff. Living in the mountain fastnesses of Eurasia, Gurdjieff devoted his life to an understanding of life’s purpose, a quest that brought him to many experiences, many teachers, and many temples. Among Gurdjieff’s books is an autobiography of sorts called Meetings with Remarkable Men in which each chapter is devoted to a unique teacher or experience on the road to self discovery. The first event recorded in the book has direct bearing on our investigation: the young Gurdjieff finds himself, along with the residents of his village, gathering in a competition at a valley in the Transcaucasus Mountains for the purpose of identifying which of several musician-mystics will be able to make the stone hills vibrate. One after another, the men play their various instruments, with none able to accomplish this feat. Finally, a priest plays a mystical scale on a reed instrument not unlike a clarinet, and follows this with throat singing, the likes of which we hear from Tibetan singers. These performers sing with their mouths at the same time as they capture a high harmonic with their throat muscles, producing a haunting double-note melody that is incomparable. Successful in making sound matter, the singer stops just as the hills begin to vibrate, repeatedly playing back his eerie sound. Here again, then, we see how sound transforms the state of matter. Can this provide a clue as to how the process by which the note symbols on the alien craft at Palo Alto’s CARET Lab made the craft fly, for example, or how other craft may achieve similar flight? We are reminded that intelligent beings have transcended mere mental counting and have spoken through abductees and mediums of the need to be aware of and connect with our entire environment.
CONCLUSIONS
All of these examples – the presumed flying language of the CARET Dragonfly UFO, the singer who vibrates mountains, the abracadabra and open sesame incantations, the integral duality of Hebrew as both a language of symbols and a system for evoking supernatural forces, the experiments showing ultrasonic levitation of matter, plants, and water responding to thoughts – illustrate the transformation of subject-object perception. We assume that we live in a dimensional space within which our place and existence in the world can best be described as those of an individual being surrounded by external and disconnected components that, like us, circulate in a gathering of separate motives and goals under the umbrella of a single reality. We have only to look at the stranger next to us on the street, in the store, or at the workplace to see how strongly we believe that we coexist but do not interconnect with the things of our world.
To work effectively in that reality, we maintain our thoughts “in here,” privately and silently, while interacting with the world around us as a canvas of everything that is “out there,” outside and beyond our inner selves.
But the power of the examples we have seen lies precisely in a unified reality where there is no division or separation between one and many, such that, when the energies or sounds are called up, they do so as a grouped synthesis of everything surrounding them in order to work as a single effort, not as a group of elements working separately. Inner and outer meet in a single greater channeling of energy, which is how I believe those symbols work. Scientists and engineers, however, are trained to see separate elements in conjoined paths of relation, not to understand that the union of things, such that they transcend their plurality, is stronger and is part of the One.
The overcoming of subjectivity (me, in here) and objectivity (them, out there) is exemplified in a film version of the Gurdjieff biography bearing the same title as the book, Meetings with Remarkable Men. Starting with young Gurdjieff on those vibrating cliffs, the film chronicles the man’s spiritual quest until he finds a monastery in which esoteric dances have been perfected. In these, each performer exists not as a separate entity in a group but as the group, as One, such that every dancer’s movements are a physical language connecting body, mind, and soul to the universe as consciousness in elevation, perhaps another deep meaning of flying craft symbols. Let us close with the part of the film that shows these dances, and you may judge for yourself whether they are instances of movements that, like symbols on a craft, seem to be distinct, yet interlock seamlessly to capture and express the unity of an elevating transcendence far beyond the product of an individual intellect, which, marveling at them, remains unable to mentally interpret what it sees.
May your own consciousness touch the greatest spatiotemporal reaches possible.